Join the movement to end censorship by Big Tech. StopBitBurning.com needs donations and support.
Trump Administration explores sanctions relief for Russia amid push to end Ukraine conflict and stop Europe’s senseless military alliance
By ljdevon // 2025-03-05
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
 Copy
 
The Trump administration is reportedly considering easing sanctions on Russia as part of a broader effort to mend diplomatic ties and resolve the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. According to sources familiar with the matter, the White House has directed the State and Treasury departments to draft proposals targeting specific Russian entities and individuals, including prominent business leaders. This move aligns with President Donald Trump’s long-standing goal of improving relations with Moscow, a strategy that has gained momentum following recent high-level diplomatic engagements.

Restoring the bulwark US-Russia relationship

The potential sanctions relief comes amid a flurry of diplomatic activity, including a February 12 phone call between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, as well as meetings in Saudi Arabia and Türkiye involving top U.S. and Russian officials. While the specifics of any concessions remain unclear, the discussions signal a shift in U.S. foreign policy, one that seeks to balance geopolitical security with economic pragmatism. The reported push to ease sanctions follows a series of diplomatic overtures between Washington and Moscow. In February, Trump and Putin initiated talks aimed at resolving the Ukraine conflict, which has dragged on for nearly a decade. Subsequent meetings in Saudi Arabia, led by U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, explored avenues for economic cooperation, including joint ventures in energy and technology. Lavrov described the Riyadh meeting as a “first step” toward rebuilding relations, emphasizing the need to “clean up the legacy” left by the Biden administration. He also highlighted the importance of appointing ambassadors to both capitals as a critical step toward restoring full-scale cooperation. Trump, however, has been clear that sanctions relief would not precede a formal peace agreement. “Any easing of restrictions would be contingent upon concrete steps toward ending the conflict in Ukraine,” he said in a recent statement.

Nord Stream 2: A potential economic lifeline

In a parallel development, Trump’s special envoy, Richard Grenell, has reportedly been engaged in secret talks to revive the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, a project that has long been a flashpoint in U.S.-Russia relations. According to German newspaper Bild, Grenell has made multiple trips to Switzerland to negotiate the restoration of the pipeline, which was completed in 2021 but never commissioned due to geopolitical tensions and sabotage. The proposed deal would involve American investors acquiring a stake in the pipeline’s operating company, effectively preventing its bankruptcy and enabling the flow of Russian gas to Germany and Central Europe. This arrangement would not only provide the U.S. with a financial stake in the project but also grant Washington significant influence over Germany’s energy supply. The Financial Times reported that one U.S.-led consortium has already drafted a plan for a deal with Russia’s energy giant Gazprom, which could be finalized if sanctions against Moscow are lifted. The potential easing of sanctions and the revival of Nord Stream 2 mark a significant departure from the adversarial stance that has characterized U.S.-Russia relations in recent years. Historically, the U.S. has viewed Russia’s actions in Ukraine as a threat to European security, leading to the imposition of stringent economic sanctions and the suspension of major energy projects like Nord Stream 2. However, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine has proven to be a protracted and costly endeavor, with no clear resolution in sight. By seeking to rebuild ties with Russia, the Trump administration appears to be pursuing a pragmatic approach that prioritizes economic cooperation and geopolitical stability over ideological confrontation. Putin has welcomed these efforts, expressing Moscow’s willingness to resolve the Ukraine conflict through peaceful means. He has also emphasized Russia’s goal of establishing an international security framework that fairly considers the interests of all parties, ensuring a lasting and indivisible peace in Europe.

Russia's perspective must be considered to prevent further war

Russia views NATO's eastward expansion as a betrayal and a direct encroachment on its historical and strategic interests. The inclusion of former Soviet republics, particularly Ukraine and Georgia, has been a flashpoint. In 2008, NATO declared that Ukraine and Georgia "will become members of NATO," a statement that alarmed Moscow. Russia's 2008 invasion of Georgia and its 2014 annexation of Crimea were, in part, responses to what it perceived as NATO's encroachment on its traditional sphere of influence. The situation escalated further in 2021 and 2022, as Ukraine sought closer ties with NATO and the West. Russia demanded legally binding guarantees that Ukraine would never join NATO and that the alliance would roll back its military presence in Eastern Europe. When these demands were rejected, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, framing it as a necessary measure to protect its security and prevent NATO's further expansion. Russia argues that NATO's expansion violates the spirit of several post-Cold War agreements, including the 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act, which aimed to build a cooperative relationship between NATO and Russia. While the act did not explicitly prohibit NATO expansion, it emphasized the importance of mutual security and transparency. Russia contends that NATO's actions have undermined these principles, creating a security dilemma that has destabilized Europe. The road to reconciliation between the U.S. and Russia is fraught with challenges. Critics argue that easing sanctions without concrete guarantees from Moscow could embolden Putin and undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty. Others warn that reviving Nord Stream 2 could deepen Europe’s dependence on Russian energy, potentially weakening the continent’s strategic autonomy. Yet, proponents of the administration’s approach argue that a new partnership with Russia is essential to ending the “forever war” in Ukraine and securing a stable geopolitical order, while pushing a hostile Europe and NATO off of Russia's borders. By lifting sanctions, restoring pipelines, and fostering economic cooperation, the U.S. and Russia could pave the way for a more collaborative relationship—one that balances mutual interests with the need for global security. Sources include: RT.com RT.com Enoch, Brighteon.ai
Mastodon
    Parler
     Gab
Copy