Further down the prestige ladder, at public colleges in Republican-controlled states, a similar shift is taking place. In these states, the push is coming from Republican lawmakers, who have belatedly recognized that DEI is a hiring program for people who hate them. In some states, lawmakers have ordered universities to abolish diversity statements, but the most on-the-ball initiatives have made sure to actually fire DEI staffers and shut down their departments. At the University of Texas-Austin, forty people lost their jobs after the school’s DEI office got the axe. At the University of Florida, officials fired 13 administrators in response to a DEI ban. The signs are all promising, to say the least. But a crucial question remains: Will all of this work? We can hope, of course. Harvard and MIT are both trendsetters for the schools just below them on the prestige ladder. Odds are good that, at least at America’s top schools and any public college in a red state, much-hated “diversity statements” will soon be a thing of the past. But don’t get too thrilled just yet. Abolishing diversity statements is not the same thing as abolishing the diversity cult itself. The situation in academia is improving in some respects, but for now it remains a matter of tiny marginal improvements to a vast, utterly rotten edifice. The state of affairs in academia today is such that broad swathes of entire disciplines—not just fake DEI disciplines—have become utterly corroded by DEI. The triumphalism over vanishing diversity statements operates on the assumption that said statements are a primary driver of anti-white and anti-male discrimination in academia. In reality, though, these statements are simply the product of a DEI-obsessed culture that exists on a deeper level. Mandatory statements during the hiring process make it easier and smoother to reject white male applicants, but the intent to reject them as often as possible was there long before. This discriminatory intent means that DEI (or woke, or race communist, pick your term of choice) priorities now pervade almost every aspect of the academic sausage-making process—to a degree that would shock most Americans. Unless this process is reformed (or, more likely, torn out at the root and replaced), universities will continue their downward spiral toward useless mediocrity.You can read the entire piece here: The Secret George Floyd Effect: DEI Rot in Universities Is Deeper and Darker Than You Imagine But Rufo’s latest piece reveals a very disturbing trend. His research shows black women in academia, particularly in DEI-related fields, are plagiarizing at rates way higher than other groups. It’s not a theory. It’s his data. And it confirms what many already suspected: the DEI machine isn’t just lowering standards; it’s erasing them completely.
Rufo and his team looked at scholars of all races, and the pattern was painfully clear: black females plagiarized more often than their peers. But instead of addressing the misconduct, the press spun a new narrative, calling plagiarism investigations “racial profiling.” Rufo’s response was hard truth: plagiarism is an individual act, and the data shows who’s doing it. Read more at: Revolver.newsIn our plagiarism research, we found a massive disparity, with black women plagiarizing at astronomically higher rates than other groups. https://t.co/mFGSymsav5
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) May 19, 2025
Watchdog group claims Biden’s climate policies may be invalid due to autopen signatures
By Cassie B. // Share
MIT shuts down DEI office amid national backlash
By Cassie B. // Share
U.S. and Argentina: New global health alliance emerges from WHO rejection
By Willow Tohi // Share
Health Revealed project launches to promote health sovereignty and expose medical authoritarianism
By finnheartley // Share
LexisNexis DATA BREACH showcases security risks of corporate data warehouses
By ljdevon // Share
Grow 40% more hair naturally with this garden oil shown to reverse baldness in men
By newseditors // Share